NEW CONTEST ALERT!!
We will provide PLC treats to the first team that has FULL participation in commenting this week.
This week we are focusing on Component D of Domain 3: Using Assessment in Instruction. Assessment has evolved over the last few years and it no longer signals the end of instruction. While it is important to know if students have learned what we set out to teach at the end of a unit, assessment for learning along the way is an important part of classroom instruction. In order to assess student learning for the purposes of instruction, teachers must have a "finger on the pulse" of a lesson, monitoring student understanding and offering appropriate feedback to students.
Teacher actions in monitoring student learning may look very similar to those used in monitoring student behavior, but have a fundamentally different purpose:
Similarly, the questions you ask for the purpose of monitoring learning are fundamentally different from those used to build understanding:
Monitoring student learning and feedback are strengthened by a teacher's skill in making mid-course corrections and adjustments, seizing a teachable moment, or using student interests to enrich an explanation.
The elements of component 3d are:
![]() |
Connections to the Personalized Learning Elements from The Institute @ CESA 1 |
- Assessment criteria
- It is essential that students know the criteria for an assessment. At its highest level, students themselves have a hand in articulating the criteria.
- Monitoring of student learning
- A teacher's skill in eliciting evidence of student understanding is one of the true marks of expertise. This is not a hit-or-miss effort, but is planned carefully in advance. Even after planning carefully, however, a teacher must weave monitoring of student learning seamlessly into the lesson, using a variety of techniques.
- Feedback to students
- Feedback on learning is an essential element of a rich instructional environment; without it students are constantly guessing at how they are doing and at hoe their work can be improved. Valuable feedback must be timely, constructive, and substantive and must provide students with the guidance they need to improve their performance.
- Student self-assessment and monitoring of progress
- The culmination of students' assumptions of responsibility for their learning is when they monitor their own learning and take appropriate action. Of course, they can do these things only if the criteria for learning are clear and if they have been taught the skills of checking their work against clear criteria.
- Lesson adjustment
- Experienced teachers are able to make both minor and (at times) major adjustments to a lesson, or mid-course corrections. Such adjustments depend on a teacher's store of alternate instructional strategies and the confidence to make a shift when needed.
Shelly uses questioning to assess student understanding during a science lab. |
In a proficient classroom...
Students appear to be aware of the assessment criteria, and the teacher monitors student learning for groups of students. Questions and assessments are regularly used to diagnose evidence of learning. Teacher feedback to groups of students is accurate and specific; some students engage in self-assessment. If impromptu measures are needed, the teacher makes minor adjustment to the lesson and does so smoothly.
Sarah works with a small group to assess their readiness. |
- The teacher confers during small group or independent work, offering suggestions to students.
- The teacher uses specifically formulated questions to elicit evidence of student understanding.
- The teacher asks student to look over their papers to correct their errors; most of them engage in this task.
In a distinguished classroom...
Assessment is fully integrated into instruction, through extensive use of formative assessment. Students appear to be aware of, and there is some evidence they have contributed to, the assessment criteria. Questions and assessments are used regularly to diagnose evidence of learning by individual students. A variety of forms of feedback, from both teacher and peers, is accurate and specific and advances learning. Students self-assess and monitor their own progress. The teacher successfully differentiates instruction to address individual students' misunderstandings.
Carly has students use their arm to show where they hear "th" within a word. She is able to quickly identify misconceptions with this formative assessment. |
What might this look like?
- The teacher reminds students of the characteristics of high-quality work, observing that the students themselves helped develop them.
- While students are working, the teacher confers, providing specific feedback to individual students.
- The teacher uses exit tickets to elicit evidence of individual student understanding.
- Students offer feedback to their classmates on their work.
- Student evaluate a piece of their writing against the rubric or writing checklists and confer with the teacher about how it could be improved.
Things to reflect upon...
- Are the standards of high quality work clear to your students?
- How do you collect evidence of student learning?
- How do you use the evidence to plan responsive instruction?
- How do you involve students in in assessment of their own work?
- How do you provide specific and timely feedback?
Comment question of the week:
How do you use assessment for learning to drive flexible grouping?Remember to encourage your team to comment as well!
Check out STEM Community Day's Cardboard Challenge!
It was a great day!
My team and I use a pre-assessment to determine where students are before we instruct on the specific targets. We use these assessments to flexibly group our students to put them at their just right instructional level. These assessments also help us with our guided groups and where students need extra instruction. I then do exit slips during instruction as check-ins for where students are as well as informal check ins during our mini lesson/problem of the day time. At the end of the unit we do a post assessment as well.
ReplyDeleteOur team also does what Level 1 does. Within small groups, I do checks on concepts to see where understanding may be breaking down to get at the root of where students are struggling and may lack some "building block" knowledge.
ReplyDeleteLevel 2 literacy uses exit slips to keep our fingers on the pulse of learning in RW. As learning targets are taught/modeled/practiced exit slip(s) are given to students to be completed independently, collected and evaluated to determine understanding/grouping.
ReplyDeleteIn Literacy, we assess students on their reading instructional levels and use this common assessment to determine our flexible groups. Our flexible groups are largely determined by this assessment and changed and adjusted throughout the year.
ReplyDeleteWe based our flexible reading groups off of data from MAPS, PALS, running records and district benchmarks. I appreciated the time we had to work on this as a team.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
I'm teaching literacy with Monika, so I also am teaching reading groups off data from MAPS, PALS, running records and district benchmarks. Students are also flexibly grouped for word work, based on letter ID, sounds, and words.
ReplyDeleteWe use our on demand writing pre-assessments to determine flexible groups for writer's workshop. We are able to group students with similar writing needs and provide mini-lessons that are specific to that group's readiness level.
ReplyDeleteWe have enjoyed using the writing assessments to guide our groups in Writer's Workshop. The students have been initially grouped using pre-assessments, but we also make smaller guided writing groups within each large group to help meet students needs.
ReplyDeleteBesides using our math common assessments to determine how we should flexibly group students across our three math homerooms, I also use these assessments as a means to create initial guided groups. The exit slips I administer and daily observations serve as other forms of assessment that drive how my guided groups change and flex throughout the math unit.
ReplyDeleteWe use assessment across the curriculum for flexible grouping. In literacy we use students reading scores to place them flexibly for guided reading. In writing we have been using pre-assessment to make flexible writing groups and then within that writing group there are small guided writing groups.
ReplyDeleteAs Monika, Sarah and I formatively assess during flexible reading groups we take note of kids who stand out from the group (typically students who are struggling) and put them on a "Need to Confer" with list. These students then receive additional instruction on top of their flexible group to further meet their needs.
ReplyDelete